Judicial Accountability — Arizona | Texas | SCOTUS

Every Judge. Every Opinion. Scored.

Court opinions scored by the Letters of the Law — Liberty, Textualism, Restraint, and Sentencing. The LTRS Score. Appellate judges and trial court judges. Same standard. The score is the score.

...
Cases Scored
...
Judges Tracked
...
Jurisdictions
2yr
Rolling Window

Four steps. One standard.

Every published appellate opinion goes through the same pipeline. No human discretion. No adjustments.

Step 01

Ingest

Every appellate court opinion is downloaded the day it publishes. Arizona, Texas, and SCOTUS. PDFs parsed, full text extracted.

Step 02

Read

AI reads the full opinion with the relevant statute text loaded alongside it. It identifies the authoring judge, the trial court judge being reviewed, and the legal reasoning used.

Step 03

Score

Each opinion is scored against the LTRS Standard — Liberty, Textualism, Restraint, Sentencing. Every score includes a cited justification. When an appellate court reviews a lower court, both judges are scored.

Step 04

Publish

Six weekly newsletters and daily tweets deliver the findings in plain English. Tuesday covers election candidates exclusively. The other five cover their topic for all judges.

The scores speak for themselves.

Every opinion earns a PASS, WATCH, or FAIL based on its composite score.

PASS
LTRS Score 80 – 100
...

Statutory compliance confirmed. The judge applied the law as written, respected individual rights, and stayed within their authority.

WATCH
LTRS Score 60 – 79
...

Significant discretionary drift. The judge's reasoning departs from the statutory text or reaches beyond the question presented.

FAIL
LTRS Score 0 – 59
...

Material statutory or constitutional violation. The judge rewrote the law, ignored enumerated rights, or exceeded their authority.

Scored by the Letters of the Law.

Every opinion is measured against four pillars — Liberty, Textualism, Restraint, Sentencing. The LTRS Score is fixed, consistent, and applied the same way to every judge at every court level.

L

Liberty

Does the ruling respect individual rights as enumerated in the federal and state constitutions?

Weighted by case type
T

Textualism

Does the judge apply the statute as written using the ordinary meaning of its text?

Weighted by case type
R

Restraint

Does the judge confine the ruling to the legal question presented and the authority granted by law?

Weighted by case type
S

Sentencing

Does the sentence reflect proportionality to the offense and the defendant's criminal history?

Criminal cases only

The LTRS Standard — Letters of the Law

Every opinion is scored against fixed definitions that don't change case to case. Every score includes a one-sentence justification citing a specific passage from the opinion. The same standard applies to every judge at every court level — from the U.S. Supreme Court to your local trial court.

Six issues a week. One for every angle.

Written by AI with extended thinking, trained on the week's full case data. No jargon, no partisanship. The facts, told well.

Get Started

The Monday Recap is free.
The rest is worth it.

Subscribe on Substack and get the Monday Recap at no cost. Upgrade anytime to unlock all six newsletters. Follow on X for daily case scores.

Subscribe on Substack → Follow on X